September
2010
Volume
87
Number
5
Pages
461
—
466
Authors
S. Nair,1
S. E. Ullrich,1
T. K. Blake,2
B. Cooper,3
C. A. Griffey,4
P. M. Hayes,5
D. J. Hole,6
R. D. Horsley,7
D. E. Obert,8
K. P. Smith,9
G. J. Muehlbauer,9 and
B.-K. Baik1,10
Affiliations
Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.Dept. of Plant Sci & Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.Busch Agricultural Resources Inc. (BARI), Fort Collins, CO.Dept. of Crop & Soil Environmental Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.Dept. of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.Dept. of Plants, Soils and Climate, Utah State University, Logan, UT.Dept. of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.USDA-ARS, Aberdeen, ID.Dept. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.Corresponding author. Phone: (509) 335-8230. E-mail: bbaik@wsu.edu
Go to Article:
RelatedArticle
Accepted April 29, 2010.
Abstract
ABSTRACTKernel hardness is an important trait influencing postharvest handling, processing, and food product quality in cereal grains. Though well-characterized in wheat, the basis of kernel hardness is still not completely understood in barley. Kernels of 959 barley breeding lines were evaluated for hardness using the Single Kernel Characterization System (SKCS). Barley lines exhibited a broad range of hardness index (HI) values at 30.1–91.9. Distribution of kernel diameter and weight were 1.7–2.9 mm and 24.9–53.7 mg, respectively. The proportion of hull was 10.2–20.7%. From the 959 breeding lines, 10 hulled spring barley lines differing in HI values (30.1–91.2) were selected to study the associations of HI with proportion of hull, kernel weight, diameter, vitreousness, protein, β-glucan, and amylose content. Vitreousness, evaluated visually using a light box, showed a clear distinction between hard and soft kernels. Hard kernels appeared translucent, while soft kernels appeared opaque when illuminated from below on the light box. Kernel brightness (L*), determined as an indicator of kernel vitreousness, showed a significant negative correlation (r = –0.83, P < 0.01) with HI. Protein, β-glucan, amylose content, proportion of hull, kernel weight, and diameter did not show any significant association with HI.
JnArticleKeywords
ArticleCopyright
© 2010 AACC International, Inc.