January
2008
Volume
85
Number
1
Pages
76
—
81
Authors
Ilankovan Paraman,1
N. S. Hettiarachchy,1,2 and
Christian Schaefer3
Affiliations
Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, 2650 N. Young Avenue, Fayetteville, AR 72704.
Corresponding author. Phone: 479-575-4779. Fax: 479-575-6936. E-mail address: nhettiar@uark.edu
DSM Nutritional Products, Dept. NRD/CF-Nutrition Research & Development and Center Formulation, PO Box 3255, 4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Go to Article:
RelatedArticle
Accepted August 20, 2007.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Rice endosperm extraction conditions were optimized by response surface methodology. The optimum alkali extraction conditions were pH 11.0 at 40°C for 3 hr with 8:1 solvent-to-solid ratio. The maximum protein yield was 43.1% at these conditions. As the extraction pH was increased from 9.0 to 12.0, protein extractability and content increased but the solubility and emulsifying properties of the extracted protein decreased. The extracted protein was recovered by either isoelectric precipitation (IEP) or ultrafiltration (UF). Ultrafiltering the supernatant with a 5-kDa hollow fiber membrane concentrated the protein from 1.8 to 16% (dry basis) and the resulting solution was spray-dried to produce a protein concentrate (RPUF) with 71% protein. Although RPIEP contained higher protein (86%) than RPUF (71%), RPUF showed higher solubility and emulsifying properties. The solubility of RPUF was higher (37%) than RPIEP (15%). RPUF also demonstrated higher emulsion activity (0.414) and stability (22.4 min) compared with the emulsion activity (0.282) and stability (15.5 min) of RPIEP. Higher solubility and the soluble nonprotein components of RPUF contributed to higher emulsifying properties than RPIEP. The UF provided milder extraction conditions with improved emulsifying properties than conventional IEP.
JnArticleKeywords
ArticleCopyright
© 2008 AACC International, Inc.