DisplayTitle

Characteristics of Noodle Flours from Japan¹

¹Cooperative investigations, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service and the Department of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University. Contribution No. 98-189-J, Department of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State Agricultural Experimental Station, Manhattan, KS 66506. Names are necessary to report factually on available data; however, the USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of the product, and the use of the name by the USDA implies no approval of the product to the exclusion of others that may also be suitable. ²Graduate research assistant and professors, respectively. Department of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506. ³Corresponding author. ⁴Supervisory research chemist, USDA/ARS, Grain Marketing and Production Research Center, Manhattan, KS 66502.

The compositions and physical properties of Japanese salt and alkaline noodle flours were contrasted and compared to those of flours from U.S. hard white and soft white wheats (HWW and SWW) and from Australian SWW wheats often segregated for salt noodles. The alkaline noodle flours averaged 11.5% protein, which was 3% higher than the salt noodle flours, and they had lower ash content (0.35 vs. 0.41%). Granulation of the salt noodle flours showed the same proportion of small particles (<38 μm) as in soft wheat flours but different levels of intermediate and large particles. The level of small particles was ≈10% greater in salt noodle flours than in the alkaline noodle flours. The alkaline noodle flours had ≈8% more fine particles and 2.5% more damaged starch than the HWW flours, which is consistent with fine grinding of hard wheat flour in the noodle flour. Starch damage also was higher in the salt noodle flours (5.3%) than in the SWW flours. The salt noodle flours had a higher sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sedimentation volume and a higher gluten index than the SWW flours from the United States. The SDS volume and gluten index were lower for the alkaline noodle flours than for the HWW flours, showing the preference for a mellow gluten of low-intermediate strength in alkaline noodle flour. Mixograph data also supported the conclusions of mellow gluten in alkaline noodle flour. The swelling powers (1.7% at 92.5°C) for Australian SWW, salt noodle, U.S. HWW, U.S. SWW, and alkaline noodle flours, were 19.4, 18.1, 17.0, 16.1, and 15.8 g/g, respectively, showing the preferences for high- and low-swelling starch, respectively, in the salt noodle and the alkaline noodle flour. A similar order of flour swelling was indicated by peak viscosity of flours heated at 12% solids in starch paste viscosity analysis. Water holding capacity of flour was correlated highly (r = 0.95, P < 0.01) with swelling power, both measured at 1.7% flour solids at 92.5°C.