November
2005
Volume
82
Number
6
Pages
702
—
705
Authors
Roxana
Yglesias
2
and
David S.
Jackson
2
,
3
Affiliations
A contribution of the University of Nebraska Agriculture Research Division, Lincoln, NE 68583. Journal Series No. 14870.
Former graduate research assistant and professor, respectively, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0919.
Corresponding author. Fax: 402-472-1693. E-mail: djackson@unlnotes.unl.edu
Go to Article:
RelatedArticle
Accepted June 21, 2005.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Preservation of starch structure/properties, including structures formed during partial or complete cooking, are important when the impact of processing conditions is being studied. Two preservation techniques used to study changes in starch during thermal-mechanical processing are commonly cited in the literature: 1) rapid freezing followed by lyophilization, and 2) a dehydration procedure using alcohols. A comparative determination on how these methods affect various starch structures has not been widely reported. Corn starch samples were collected from the Rapid Visco-Analyser (RVA) at 3 min (swollen granules, 30°C), at the top of the pasting peak (gelatinized granules, 95°C), at the bottom of the trough (dispersed polymers, 95°C), and a completed RVA sample stored for 120 hr at 4°C (retrograded starch). Samples of masa were obtained by nixtamalizing corn. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) endotherms of starch and masa, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of masa were evaluated after being preserved by alcohol- or freeze-drying. No significant differences (P > 0.05) between methods were found for onset, end, and peak temperatures (°C), enthalpy (J/g) and % relative crystallinity in any of the samples analyzed. Liquid nitrogen freeze-drying and ethanol dehydration are both effective methods of preserving various starch systems for structural changes detectible by DSC and XRD; freeze-drying is generally less expensive and time-consuming.
JnArticleKeywords
ArticleCopyright
© 2005 AACC International, Inc.