July
2008
Volume
85
Number
4
Pages
495
—
501
Authors
X. Wu,2
R. Zhao,2
L. Liu,2
S. Bean,3
P. A. Seib,4
J. McLaren,5
R. Madl,4
M. Tuinstra,6
M. Lenz,7 and
D. Wang2,8
Affiliations
Contribution No. 08-330-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Manhattan, KS 66506.Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.USDA-ARS Grain Marketing and Production Research Center, Manhattan, KS 66502. Names are necessary to report factually on available data; however, USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of the product, and the use of the name by the USDA implies no approval of the product to the exclusion of others that may also be suitable.Department of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.StrathKirn, Inc., Chesterfield, MO 67108.Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.Monsanto, 7159 N. 247th West, Mt. Hope, KS 67108.Corresponding author. Phone: 785-5322919. Fax: 785-5325825. E-mail address: dwang@ksu.edu
Go to Article:
RelatedArticle
Accepted April 10, 2008.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Nine sorghum cultivars (five inbred lines and four hybrids) were grown in 2006 in three locations (Mount Hope, KS, Halstead, KS, and Plainview, TX) under different irrigation conditions and were evaluated for composition and ethanol fermentation efficiency. The objective was to study, in one growing season, the effects of genotype, growing location, and irrigation on the physical and chemical properties and fermentation efficiencies of grain sorghum. Genotype had a significant effect on chemical composition, physical properties, and ethanol yield. The cultivars showed a large variation in starch (61.0–74.8%), protein (7.56–16.35%), crude fat (2.79–4.77%), crude fiber (0.58–2.57%), ash (1.25–2.26%), kernel weight (20.0–35.9 mg), kernel hardness (49.6–97.5), and kernel size (1.9–2.7 mm) and were the most important factors affecting ethanol fermentation efficiency (87.5–93.9%). Starch and protein contents were significantly affected by growing location but not by irrigation. Environment had a significant effect on ethanol yields. Unexpectedly, irrigation somewhat reduced fermentation efficiency.
JnArticleKeywords
ArticleCopyright
© 2008 AACC International, Inc.