November
2008
Volume
85
Number
6
Pages
808
—
816
Authors
R. Gutiérrez-Dorado,1
A. E. Ayala-Rodríguez,2
J. Milán-Carrillo,1,2
J. López-Cervantes,3
J. A. Garzón-Tiznado,1,4
J. A. López-Valenzuela,1,2
O. Paredes-López,5 and
C. Reyes-Moreno1,2,6
Affiliations
Programa Regional del Noroeste para el Doctorado en Biotecnología, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, México.
Maestría en Ciencia y Tecnología de Alimentos, Facultad de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, México.
Programa Regional del Noroeste para el Doctorado en Biotecnología, Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora, México.
Centro de Investigaciones Regionales del Noroeste, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Valle de Culiacán, Sinaloa, México.
Unidad Irapuato, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados–Instituto Politécnico Nacional.
Corresponding author. E-mail: creyes@uas.uasnet.mx
Go to Article:
RelatedArticle
Accepted May 8, 2008.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Nixtamalized and extruded flours from quality protein maize (QPM, V-537C) and tortillas made from them were evaluated for some technological and nutritional properties and compared with the commercial brand MASECA. Both QPM flours showed higher (P < 0.05) protein content, total color difference, pH, available lysine, and lower (P < 0.05) total starch content, Hunter L value, water absorption index, gelatinization enthalpy, resistant starch, and retrograded resistant starch than nixtamalized MASECA flour. Tortillas from nixtamalized and extruded QPM flours had higher contents of essential amino acids than tortillas from MASECA flour, except for leucine. Tortillas from processed QPM flours also showed higher (P < 0.05) values of the nutritional indicators calculated protein efficiency ratio (C-PER 1.80–1.85 vs. 1.04), apparent and true in vivo protein digestibility (78.4-79.1 vs. 75.6% and 76.4–77.4 vs. 74.2%, respectively), PER (2.30–2.43 vs. 1.31), net protein retention (NPR; 2.88–2.89 vs. 2.11), and protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS; 54–55 vs. 29% based on preschool children and 100 vs. 85% based on adults) than MASECA flour. The use of QPM for flour and tortilla preparation may have a positive effect on the nutritional status of people from countries where these products are widely consumed.
JnArticleKeywords
ArticleCopyright
© 2008 AACC International, Inc.